[STLinux Kernel] [PATCH v3 7/8] rtc: st: add new driver for ST's LPC RTC
From: peter.griffin@linaro.org (Peter Griffin)
Date: 2015-02-23 10:12:32
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-watchdog, lkml
From: peter.griffin@linaro.org (Peter Griffin)
Date: 2015-02-23 10:12:32
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-watchdog, lkml
Hi Lee, On Wed, 18 Feb 2015, Lee Jones wrote:
ST's Low Power Controller (LPC) controls two devices; watchdog and RTC. Only one of the devices can be used at any one time. This is enforced by the correlating MFD driver. This portion of the driver-set controls the Real Time Clock.
<snip>
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&rtc->lock, flags);
+
+ writel(1, rtc->ioaddr + LPC_WDT_OFF);
+
+ writel(msb, rtc->ioaddr + LPC_LPA_MSB_OFF);
+ writel(lsb, rtc->ioaddr + LPC_LPA_LSB_OFF);
+ writel(1, rtc->ioaddr + LPC_LPA_START_OFF);
+
+ writel(0, rtc->ioaddr + LPC_WDT_OFF);I think all the writel IO accessors in this driver can be replaced with the *_relaxed variant. This will avoid the overhead of taking a spinlock in the l2 outer cache part of writel. <snip>
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
+static int st_rtc_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct st_rtc *rtc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+ if (device_may_wakeup(dev))
+ return 0;
+
+ writel(1, rtc->ioaddr + LPC_WDT_OFF);
+ writel(0, rtc->ioaddr + LPC_LPA_START_OFF);
+ writel(0, rtc->ioaddr + LPC_WDT_OFF);Is there a reason for not disabling the IP clock in suspend / resume functions? regards, Peter.