Thread (121 messages) 121 messages, 20 authors, 2015-02-19

[PATCH v8 02/21] acpi: fix acpi_os_ioremap for arm64

From: Mark Salter <hidden>
Date: 2015-02-05 13:55:28
Also in: linux-acpi, lkml

On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 10:41 +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 06:58:14PM +0000, Mark Salter wrote:
quoted
On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 17:57 +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 04:08:27PM +0000, Mark Salter wrote:
quoted
acpi_os_remap() is used to map ACPI tables. These tables may be in ram
which are already included in the kernel's linear RAM mapping. So we
need ioremap_cache to avoid two mappings to the same physical page
having different caching attributes.
What's the call path to acpi_os_ioremap() on such tables already in the
linear mapping? I can see an acpi_map() function which already takes
care of the RAM mapping case but there are other cases where
acpi_os_ioremap() is called directly. For example,
acpi_os_read_memory(), can it be called on both RAM and I/O?
acpi_map() is the one I've seen.
By default, if should_use_kmap() is not patched for arm64, it translates
to page_is_ram(); acpi_map() would simply use a kmap() which returns the
current kernel linear mapping on arm64.
The problem with kmap() is that it only maps a single page. I've seen
tables over 4k which is why I patched acpi_map() not to use kmap() on
arm64.
quoted
I'm not sure about others.
Question for the ARM ACPI guys: what happens if you implement
acpi_os_ioremap() on arm64 as just ioremap()? Do you get any WARN_ON()
(__ioremap_caller() checks whether the memory is RAM)?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help