[PATCH] PCI: Fix pcibios_update_irq misuse of irq number
From: Marc Zyngier <hidden>
Date: 2015-02-03 11:38:00
Also in:
linux-pci, lkml
On 03/02/15 11:31, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 03 February 2015 10:38:25 Marc Zyngier wrote:quoted
That's exactly what I thought until Lorenzo reported kvmtool falling over because of this write. Obviously, some platforms must actually require this (possibly for bridges that are not known by the firmware).This sounds much like a bug in kvmtool.
Lorenzo and I just came to a similar conclusion, given that the HW should never use that information.
quoted
Entirely removing that code solves my problem too, but that'd cannot be the right solution...The comment in pdev_fixup_irq() says /* Always tell the device, so the driver knows what is the real IRQ to use; the device does not use it. */ which I read to mean that there are drivers that incorrectly use 'pci_read_config_byte(dev, PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE)' as the number they pass into request_irq, rather than using dev->irq. However, this means that your patch is actually wrong, because what the driver cares about is the virtual irq number (which request_irq expects), not the number relative to some interrupt controller.
Yes, I now realise that. That makes a lot more sense actually, because I was getting very confused about how the HW should interpret that number. Side question: In the probe-only case, should we still allow this write to happen? Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...