On Friday 30 January 2015 17:51:24 Eduardo Valentin wrote:

quoted

quoted

@@ -90,6 +84,20 @@ config ARM_EXYNOS_CPU_FREQ_BOOST_SW
 
      If in doubt, say N.
 
+config ARM_EXYNOS5440_CPUFREQ
+   bool "SAMSUNG EXYNOS5440"
+   depends on SOC_EXYNOS5440
+   depends on HAVE_CLK && OF
+   select PM_OPP
+   default y
+   help
+     This adds the CPUFreq driver for Samsung EXYNOS5440
+     SoC. The nature of exynos5440 clock controller is
+     different than previous exynos controllers so not using
+     the common exynos framework.
+
+     If in doubt, say N.

I believe this one also has to be tristate, for the same reason.

I agree with you that it is better if we make it tristate. So, on my
side, I have no concerns changing it to tristate.

However, the exynos5440 cpufreq driver does not depend on of thermal as
of today, and therefore, I did not touch this driver for this matter.
Meaning, if it is not causing troubles, no need to mess with it.

But I can add this change. No issues, on my side.

Sorry, my mistake. I remembered incorrectly that the problem was
in both modules, but you are right that it does not exist in the exynos5440
one. It is not a mistake to turn this into tristate, but there is no
immediate neeed, so either version is fine.

	Arnd