Hi Thomas,
On 15/01/2015 09:24, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
Dear Gregory CLEMENT,
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 08:50:07 +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
quoted
quoted
Any reason to use <0x184A0 0xC> instead of <0x184A8 0x4> ? According to
the datasheet, there is only this 184A8 register for RTC stuff.
Yes but according to the code I saw there were other registers related to the RTC
from 0x184A0. Even if we don't use them now I prefer having an accurate mapping from
the beginning for avoiding using negative offset as we needed to do in the past.
So I presume you mean that there are undocumented registers, since I
didn't see them in the datasheet. Is this correct?
Yes indeed there are not documented in the current version of our datasheet.
Thanks,
Gregory
--
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com