[PATCH v2 6/9] watchdog: st_wdt: Add new driver for ST's LPC Watchdog
From: linux@roeck-us.net (Guenter Roeck)
Date: 2015-01-22 19:32:10
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-watchdog, lkml
From: linux@roeck-us.net (Guenter Roeck)
Date: 2015-01-22 19:32:10
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-watchdog, lkml
On 01/22/2015 09:21 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, Guenter Roeck wrote:quoted
On 01/22/2015 03:56 AM, Lee Jones wrote:quoted
Signed-off-by: David Paris <redacted> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <redacted> --- drivers/watchdog/Kconfig | 13 ++ drivers/watchdog/Makefile | 1 + drivers/watchdog/st_lpc_wdt.c | 335 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 349 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/watchdog/st_lpc_wdt.c[...]quoted
quoted
+struct st_wdog_syscfg { + struct regmap *regmap;Hi David & Lee, Why did you add the regmap pointer to this structure and not to st_wdog ? It is not a configuration value, after all, and it is always dereferenced through wt_wdog->syscfg. So all it does is to make the code more complicated. Am I missing something ?I guess it was just to group it all together, as it will all be used at the same time: regmap_update_bits(st_wdog->syscfg->regmap, st_wdog->syscfg->reset_type_reg, st_wdog->syscfg->reset_type_mask, st_wdog->warm_reset); It really doesn't matter to me either way.
Having it in syscfg means it is stored in the static configuration data instead of the allocated data, which is at least conceptually wrong. So I think it should be in st_wdog. Thanks, Guenter