[PATCH v3 3/5] ARM: at91/dt: update udc compatible strings
From: Boris Brezillon <hidden>
Date: 2015-01-12 19:42:11
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:31:26 -0600 Felipe Balbi [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 08:18:16PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:quoted
Hi Felipe, On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:23:49 -0600 Felipe Balbi [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:57:56AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:quoted
at91sam9g45, at91sam9x5 and sama5 SoCs should not use "atmel,at91sam9rl-udc" for their USB device compatible property since this compatible is attached to a specific hardware bug fix. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <redacted> Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <redacted>WARNING: DT compatible string "atmel,at91sam9g45-udc" appears un-documented -- check ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ #177: FILE: drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c:1827: + { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g45-udc" }, WARNING: DT compatible string "atmel,sama5d3-udc" appears un-documented -- check ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ #178: FILE: drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c:1828: + { .compatible = "atmel,sama5d3-udc" }, please fix and resend. Also, when resending, could you add Nicolas' Acked-by since he's already given it ?Actually these compatible strings are documented in the first patch (where they were introduced), but I'll send a v4 with Nicolas' ack.heh, checkpatch stupidity :-) My bad.
You took v3 of the first patch instead of v4. Don't know if you can replace it (anyway, that's not such a big deal since the only change is the commit message)... -- Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com