On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Kevin Hilman [off-list ref] wrote:

"Rafael J. Wysocki" [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

On Monday, December 15, 2014 09:48:19 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:

quoted

CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0 disappeared with commit bbcf071969b20f
("cpufreq: cpu0: rename driver and internals to 'cpufreq_dt'") and some
defconfigs are still using it instead of the new one.

Use the renamed CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT generic driver.

Cc: <redacted>        # 3.18
Reported-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

OK, so who should be applying this?

Normally, we take these defconfig changes through the arm-soc tree, and
I think that should continue, otherwise we'll be bound to have conflicts.

Note all the pull requests for this merge window are already sent, but
I'll queue this up in arm-soc/fixes so it can make it during the
v3.19-rc cycle.

Any chance of the following being queued for the .19 window or do we
wait to go through Tony?
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5484401/