[PATCH 1/3] staging: imx-drm: document internal HDMI I2C master controller DT binding
From: andy.yan@rock-chips.com (Andy Yan)
Date: 2014-12-02 06:36:18
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-i2c, linux-media
Hi Vladimir: I am working on convert imx-hdmi to dw_hdmi now: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/1/190 I also have a plan to use the internal HDMI I2C master under the I2c framework, and I also have a patch to do this work. So glad to see your work. Please also Cc me[off-list ref] and Zubair.Kakakhel at imgtec.com, maybe Zubair also have interests on your future patch. On 2014?12?02? 00:22, Philipp Zabel wrote:
Hi Vladimir, [Added Andy Yan to Cc:, because imx-hdmi->dw-hdmi] Am Montag, den 01.12.2014, 17:39 +0200 schrieb Vladimir Zapolskiy:quoted
On 01.12.2014 17:11, Philipp Zabel wrote:quoted
Am Montag, den 01.12.2014, 16:54 +0200 schrieb Vladimir Zapolskiy:quoted
Hi Philipp and Shawn, On 15.11.2014 19:49, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:quoted
Provide information about how to bind internal iMX6Q/DL HDMI DDC I2C master controller. The property is set as optional one, because iMX6 HDMI DDC bus may be represented by one of general purpose I2C busses found on SoC. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <redacted> Cc: Wolfram Sang <redacted> Cc: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de> Cc: Shawn Guo <redacted> Cc: devicetree at vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-media at vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-i2c at vger.kernel.org --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/staging/imx-drm/hdmi.txt | 10 +++++++++- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/staging/imx-drm/hdmi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/staging/imx-drm/hdmi.txt index 1b756cf..43c8924 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/staging/imx-drm/hdmi.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/staging/imx-drm/hdmi.txt@@ -10,6 +10,8 @@ Required properties: - #address-cells : should be <1> - #size-cells : should be <0> - compatible : should be "fsl,imx6q-hdmi" or "fsl,imx6dl-hdmi". + If internal HDMI DDC I2C master controller is supposed to be used, + then "simple-bus" should be added to compatible value. - gpr : should be <&gpr>. The phandle points to the iomuxc-gpr region containing the HDMI multiplexer control register.@@ -22,6 +24,7 @@ Required properties: Optional properties: - ddc-i2c-bus: phandle of an I2C controller used for DDC EDID probing + - ddc: internal HDMI DDC I2C master controller example:@@ -32,7 +35,7 @@ example: hdmi: hdmi at 0120000 { #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <0>; - compatible = "fsl,imx6q-hdmi"; + compatible = "fsl,imx6q-hdmi", "simple-bus"; reg = <0x00120000 0x9000>; interrupts = <0 115 0x04>; gpr = <&gpr>;@@ -40,6 +43,11 @@ example: clock-names = "iahb", "isfr"; ddc-i2c-bus = <&i2c2>; + hdmi_ddc: ddc { + compatible = "fsl,imx6q-hdmi-ddc"; + status = "disabled"; + }; + port at 0 { reg = <0>;knowing in advance that I2C framework lacks a graceful support of non fully compliant I2C devices, do you have any objections to the proposed iMX HDMI DTS change?I'm not sure about this. Have you seen "drm: Decouple EDID parsing from I2C adapter"? I feel like in the absence of a ddc-i2c-bus property the imx-hdmi/dw-hdmi driver should try to use the internal HDMI DDC I2C master controller, bypassing the I2C framework altogether.My idea is exactly not to bypass the I2C framework, briefly the rationale is that * it allows to reuse I2C UAPI/tools naturally applied to the internal iMX HDMI DDC bus, * it allows to use iMX HDMI DDC bus as an additional feature-limited I2C bus on SoC (who knows, I absolutely won't be surprised, if anyone needs it on practice), * if an HDMI controller supports an external I2C bus, the integration with HDMI DDC bus driver based on I2C framework is seamless. However I agree that the selected approach may look odd, the question is if the oddness comes from the technical side or from the fact that nobody has done it before this way. I'm open to any critique, if the proposal of creating an I2C bus from HDMI DDC bus is lame, then I suppose the shared iMX HDMI DDC bus driver should be converted to something formless and internally used by imx-hdmi. The negative side-effects of such a change from my point of view are * more or less natural modularity is lost, * a number of I2C framework API/functions should be copy-pasted to the updated HDMI DDC bus driver to support a subset of I2C read/write transactions.If Wolfram is happy to accomodate such feature limited, 'I2C master' devices in i2c/drivers/busses in principle, I won't disagree. But then it should be abstracted properly. The dw-hdmi-tx core on i.MX6 has the DDC I2C master register space at 0x7e00 - 0x7e12. What are the offsets on the Rockchip version? If the "simple-bus" compatible is to be set on the hdmi driver, the ddc driver should do its own register access, and therefore needs a reg property. I suspect for the ddc-i2cm we should get away with a common compatible like "snps,dw-hdmi-i2c". hdmi: hdmi at 120000 { /* ... */ compatible = "fsl,imx6q-hdmi", "snps,dw-hdmi"; ddc-i2c-bus = <&hdmi_ddc>; hdmi_ddc: i2c at 127e00 { compatible = "snps,dw-hdmi-i2c"; reg = <0x1207e00 0x13> }; /* could add phy-i2cm, cec, ... here */ }; Also there's an i2c bus for communication with the phy at 0x3020 - 0x3032, should that be handled in a similar way, then?
Rockchip RK3288 has the same DDC I2C master and phy i2c master
register offset as imx hdmi.
what my suggestion is: make the ddc-i2c-bus property optional, if
the dw_hdmi driver
can't found the ddc-i2c-bus node, then use the internal i2cm:
ddc_node = of_parse_phandle(np, "ddc-i2c-bus", 0);
if (ddc_node) {
hdmi->ddc = of_find_i2c_adapter_by_node(ddc_node);
of_node_put(ddc_node);
if (!hdmi->ddc) {
dev_dbg(hdmi->dev, "failed to read ddc node\n");
return -EPROBE_DEFER;
}
} else {
hdmi->ddc = dw_hdmi_ddc_adapter_register(hdmi).
}
and we can have a file put with dw_hdmi.c in a same dir, which
implement standard i2c adapter interface .
I found that other hdmi platform such as msm(/msm/hdmi/hdmi_i2c.c) ,
radeon(radeon_i2c.c) also do like this
Do we need to make the hdmi driver a proper interrupt controller? At least the two i2c masters have two interrupts each, "done" and "error". regards Philipp