Hi Uwe,
Uwe Kleine-K?nig [off-list ref] writes:
Hello,
finally I managed to test this series on my (unmodified) rn104.
For patch 1: Maybe point out that the issue with the century bit isn't
that critical, because this bit is not expected to be set before year 2100.
For patch 3: This patch adds a few dev_err calls that get later amended
in patch 5 to also include an error code. IMHO these should already be
added in patch 3. Patch 5 should only add it to the already existing
strings (if applicable).
For patch 4: Maybe
s/obsolete/for backwards compatibility, don't use in new code/.
Some further comments inline ...
Thanks for the tests. I'll take a look at your comments this evening.
Cheers,
a+