[RFC v1 PATCH 1/2] of/pci: add of_pci_dma_configure() update dma configuration
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
Date: 2014-12-22 22:24:59
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-pci, lkml
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
Date: 2014-12-22 22:24:59
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-pci, lkml
On Monday 22 December 2014 16:40:43 Murali Karicheri wrote:
quoted
quoted
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c@@ -2052,9 +2052,10 @@ void arch_setup_dma_ops(struct device *dev, u64dma_base, u64 size, struct iommu_ops *iommu, bool coherent) { struct dma_map_ops *dma_ops; + u64 temp_size = min((*(dev->dma_mask) + 1), size); dev->archdata.dma_coherent = coherent; - if (arm_setup_iommu_dma_ops(dev, dma_base, size, iommu)) + if (arm_setup_iommu_dma_ops(dev, dma_base, temp_size, iommu)) If you agree, I will post v1 of the patch with these updates. Let me know. I did some basic tests on Keystone with these changes and it works fine.It's not exactly what I meant. My main point was that we need to limit dev->dma_mask to (size-1) here, but you are not touching that.if you mean overriding the dev->dma_mask to min((*dev->dma_mask), size-1), then I am getting the error "Coherent DMA mask 0x7fffffff (pfn 0x780000-0x800000) covers a smaller range of system memory than the DMA zone pfn 0x0-0x880000) when the devices on Keystone tries to set the dma mask. Something wrong and I need to look into the code.
Right, it sounds like the offset was applied incorrectly at some point. What are the DMA zone size and the phys-offset? Arnd