[RESEND][PATCH v15 7/7] ARM: kprobes: enable OPTPROBES for ARM 32
flat view
From: Masami Hiramatsu <hidden>
Date: 2014-12-09 10:25:16
Also in:
lkml
(2014/12/09 18:14), Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: [...]
quoted
quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/core.c b/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/core.c index 3a58db4..a4ec240 100644 --- a/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/core.c +++ b/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/core.c@@ -163,19 +163,31 @@ void __kprobes arch_arm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p) * memory. It is also needed to atomically set the two half-words of a 32-bit * Thumb breakpoint. */ -int __kprobes __arch_disarm_kprobe(void *p) -{ - struct kprobe *kp = p; - void *addr = (void *)((uintptr_t)kp->addr & ~1); - - __patch_text(addr, kp->opcode); +struct patch { + void *addr; + unsigned int insn; +}; +static int __kprobes_remove_breakpoint(void *data) +{ + struct patch *p = data; + __patch_text(p->addr, p->insn); return 0; } +void __kprobes kprobes_remove_breakpoint(void *addr, unsigned int insn) +{ + struct patch p = { + .addr = addr, + .insn = insn, + }; + stop_machine(__kprobes_remove_breakpoint, &p, cpu_online_mask); +}Hmm, I think finally we should fix patch_text() in patch.c to forcibly use stop_machine by adding "bool stop" parameter, instead of introducing new another patch_text() implementation, because we'd better avoid two private "patch" data structures.That was my first thought too, then I realised that breaks encapsulation of the patch_text implementation, because its use of stop_machine is an implementation detail and it could be rewritten to not use stop machine. (That is sort of on my long term todo list https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/4/188)
Indeed. OK, now let it goes. :)
Whereas stop machine is used by kprobes to avoid race conditions with the undefined instruction exception handler and something like that would be needed even if patch_text didn't use stop_machine.
At this point, it's OK. However, I'm not convinced completely. Perhaps, it depends on cache-coherent bus implementation, but there may be some implementations which can allow us to change one instruction atomically without stop_machine. I'm actually interested in PREEMPT_RT on arm32, and this stop_machine() is a barrier to apply kprobes on real-time systems. Thank you, -- Masami HIRAMATSU Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Research Center Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt at hitachi.com