Thread (20 messages) 20 messages, 7 authors, 2015-01-26

[PATCH 3/3] ARM: edma: Split up header file to platform_data and API file

From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
Date: 2014-12-08 13:18:08
Also in: alsa-devel, linux-mmc, linux-omap, linux-spi, lkml

On Monday 08 December 2014 18:19:17 Vinod Koul wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 12:41:31PM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
quoted
include/linux/platform_data/ is not a correct place to keep the API
definitions for edma, it is meant to be only for the pdata for the device.
Clean up this by moving the API to include/linux/edma.h

Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <redacted>
---
 arch/arm/common/edma.c                     |   3 +-
 arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices.c            |   1 +
 arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/da8xx.h |   1 +
 drivers/dma/edma.c                         |   2 +-
 include/linux/edma.h                       | 153 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/platform_data/edma.h         | 148 ++--------------------------
 sound/soc/davinci/davinci-pcm.h            |   1 +
 7 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 144 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 include/linux/edma.h
I was hoping that this will have delete for platform_data/edma.h, do we
still need that and why shouldn't we get rid of this 
I think the platform_data/edma.h file is needed for as long as we have
mach-davinci systems that are not converted to boot using DT. At the current
pace of development in that area, I would expect that to take a few more
years at least: da850 support is slowly proceeding (since 2012), da830 should
be fairly straightforward to add once da850 is done, but I haven't seen
anybody start working on the dm* socs for DT.

	Arnd
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help