On 12/5/2014 6:14 PM, Ray Jui wrote:

quoted

quoted

+static struct irq_chip bcm_cygnus_gpio_irq_chip = {
+    .name = "bcm-cygnus-gpio",
+    .irq_ack = bcm_cygnus_gpio_irq_ack,
+    .irq_mask = bcm_cygnus_gpio_irq_mask,
+    .irq_unmask = bcm_cygnus_gpio_irq_unmask,
+    .irq_set_type = bcm_cygnus_gpio_irq_set_type,
+};

const?

Sure, will add const to bcm_cygnus_gpio_irq_chip

quoted

quoted

+static struct irq_domain_ops bcm_cygnus_irq_ops = {
+    .map = bcm_cygnus_gpio_irq_map,
+    .unmap = bcm_cygnus_gpio_irq_unmap,
+    .xlate = irq_domain_xlate_twocell,
+};

const here too?

Yes, will make bcm_cygnus_irq_ops const.

Actually, I cannot make them const here. Note they are passed into other 
APIs which can potentially modifies their values internally.

drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-cygnus.c: In function ?bcm_cygnus_gpio_irq_map?:
drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-cygnus.c:430:4: warning: passing argument 2 of 
?irq_set_chip_and_handler? discards ?const? qualifier from pointer 
target type [enabled by default]
     handle_simple_irq);
     ^
In file included from drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-cygnus.c:17:0:
include/linux/irq.h:461:20: note: expected ?struct irq_chip *? but 
argument is of type ?const struct irq_chip *?
  static inline void irq_set_chip_and_handler(unsigned int irq, struct 
irq_chip *chip,
                     ^
drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-cygnus.c: In function ?bcm_cygnus_gpio_probe?:
drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-cygnus.c:679:5: warning: passing argument 2 of 
?irq_set_chip_and_handler? discards ?const? qualifier from pointer 
target type [enabled by default]
      handle_simple_irq);
      ^
In file included from drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-cygnus.c:17:0:
include/linux/irq.h:461:20: note: expected ?struct irq_chip *? but 
argument is of type ?const struct irq_chip *?
  static inline void irq_set_chip_and_handler(unsigned int irq, struct 
irq_chip *chip,