Thread (40 messages) 40 messages, 5 authors, 2014-12-20

[PATCH 10/12] ARM: vf610m4: add new machine and SoC for Vybrid on Cortex-M4

From: stefan@agner.ch (Stefan Agner)
Date: 2014-12-03 17:58:27
Also in: linux-devicetree, lkml

On 2014-12-03 11:56, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 03 December 2014 01:12:09 Stefan Agner wrote:
quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
index 89c4b5c..fdebe18 100644
--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
@@ -459,6 +459,18 @@ config ARCH_FOOTBRIDGE
 	  Support for systems based on the DC21285 companion chip
 	  ("FootBridge"), such as the Simtec CATS and the Rebel NetWinder.

+menuconfig ARCH_MXCM4
+	bool "Freescale Vybrid/i.MX family on Cortex-M4" if !MMU
+	select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
+	select ARM_CPU_SUSPEND if PM
+	select CLKSRC_MMIO
+	select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP
+	select PINCTRL
+	select PM_OPP if PM
+	select SOC_BUS
+	help
+	  Support for Freescale Vybrid/iMX-based family of processors on Cortex-M4
+
 config ARCH_NETX
 	bool "Hilscher NetX based"
 	select ARM_VIC
I would really prefer not to see any more standalone machine types,
but rather have ARMv7-M as one of the options for the
multiplatform configuration. In particular, that would let us
do *build* testing on a combined mxcm4/efm32/vexpress kernel,
although that kernel would clearly not be usable anywhere
because of the restrictions of nommu machines.
Yes me too, but as I pointed out in the cover letter, I'm not sure I'm
up to that task.... I'm not at all in a hurry with the Vybrid M4 Linux
stuff, so I can wait until that is resolved or maybe try to resolve that
myself (again)...

Beside that the multi-platform would help do build tests, Vybrid is also
a nice platform to do smoke tests on a !MMU platform. Uwe would be happy
about that, as he discovered that !MMU was broken for several releases
lately :-)
quoted
+static void __init vf610m4_init_irq(void)
+{
+	vf610_mscm_init();
+	irqchip_init();
+}
Can you make vf610_mscm_init get called from irqchip and remove this
function?
I guess you mean by IRQCHIP_DECLARE? I hesitated to do this since I only
found drivers in drivers/irqchip using that. However, MSCM is currently
part of mach-imx. First I used arch_extn to implement the functionality,
so I thought it really fits more into arch. But I guess when it is a
normal irqchip driver, I will have to move it anyway, despite the fact
that it is only available on Vybrid....?

--
Stefan
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help