[PATCH 10/12] ARM: vf610m4: add new machine and SoC for Vybrid on Cortex-M4
From: stefan@agner.ch (Stefan Agner)
Date: 2014-12-03 17:58:27
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
On 2014-12-03 11:56, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 03 December 2014 01:12:09 Stefan Agner wrote:quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig index 89c4b5c..fdebe18 100644 --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig@@ -459,6 +459,18 @@ config ARCH_FOOTBRIDGE Support for systems based on the DC21285 companion chip ("FootBridge"), such as the Simtec CATS and the Rebel NetWinder. +menuconfig ARCH_MXCM4 + bool "Freescale Vybrid/i.MX family on Cortex-M4" if !MMU + select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB + select ARM_CPU_SUSPEND if PM + select CLKSRC_MMIO + select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP + select PINCTRL + select PM_OPP if PM + select SOC_BUS + help + Support for Freescale Vybrid/iMX-based family of processors on Cortex-M4 + config ARCH_NETX bool "Hilscher NetX based" select ARM_VICI would really prefer not to see any more standalone machine types, but rather have ARMv7-M as one of the options for the multiplatform configuration. In particular, that would let us do *build* testing on a combined mxcm4/efm32/vexpress kernel, although that kernel would clearly not be usable anywhere because of the restrictions of nommu machines.
Yes me too, but as I pointed out in the cover letter, I'm not sure I'm up to that task.... I'm not at all in a hurry with the Vybrid M4 Linux stuff, so I can wait until that is resolved or maybe try to resolve that myself (again)... Beside that the multi-platform would help do build tests, Vybrid is also a nice platform to do smoke tests on a !MMU platform. Uwe would be happy about that, as he discovered that !MMU was broken for several releases lately :-)
quoted
+static void __init vf610m4_init_irq(void) +{ + vf610_mscm_init(); + irqchip_init(); +}Can you make vf610_mscm_init get called from irqchip and remove this function?
I guess you mean by IRQCHIP_DECLARE? I hesitated to do this since I only found drivers in drivers/irqchip using that. However, MSCM is currently part of mach-imx. First I used arch_extn to implement the functionality, so I thought it really fits more into arch. But I guess when it is a normal irqchip driver, I will have to move it anyway, despite the fact that it is only available on Vybrid....? -- Stefan