Thread (38 messages) flat view 38 messages, 5 authors, 2014-12-15

[PATCH v3 02/11] mfd: syscon: Add Atmel Matrix bus DT binding documentation

From: Boris Brezillon <hidden>
Date: 2014-12-03 14:52:41
Also in: linux-devicetree, lkml

Hi Nicolas,

On Wed, 3 Dec 2014 15:32:49 +0100
Nicolas Ferre [off-list ref] wrote:
Le 01/12/2014 11:27, Boris Brezillon a ?crit :
quoted
The Matrix registers are provided to configure internal bus behavior on
at91 SoCs.
Some registers might be access by several drivers (e.g. to configure
external memory bus timings), hence we declare this register set as a
syscon device.

Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <redacted>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <redacted>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-matrix.txt       | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-matrix.txt
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-matrix.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-matrix.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e56e27a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-matrix.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+* Device tree bindings for Atmel Bus Matrix
+
+The Bus Matrix registers are used to configure Atmel SoCs internal bus
+behavior (master/slave priorities, undefined burst length type, ...)
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible:		Should be one of the following
+			"atmel,at91sam9260-matrix", "syscon"
+			"atmel,at91sam9261-matrix", "syscon"
+			"atmel,at91sam9263-matrix", "syscon"
+			"atmel,at91sam9263-matrix", "syscon"
Same string as the preceding one: shouldn't it be at91sam9rl?
Indeed, and macro definitions for the 9rl are also missing in the
atmel-matrix.h header.

Thanks,

Boris

-- 
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help