Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 2 authors, 2014-11-15
DORMANTno replies
Revisions (9)
  1. v3 [diff vs current]
  2. v3 [diff vs current]
  3. v3 [diff vs current]
  4. v3 [diff vs current]
  5. v3 [diff vs current]
  6. v3 [diff vs current]
  7. v5 [diff vs current]
  8. v5 current
  9. v6 [diff vs current]

[PATCH v5 0/6] ARM64: Add support for FSL's LS2085A SoC

From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
Date: 2014-11-15 11:15:31

On Saturday 15 November 2014 11:06:42 bhupesh.sharma at freescale.com wrote:
quoted
-----Original Message-----
From: Arnd Bergmann [mailto:arnd at arndb.de]
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2014 4:32 PM
To: Sharma Bhupesh-B45370
Cc: Catalin.Marinas at arm.com; mark.rutland at arm.com; linux-arm-
kernel at lists.infradead.org; grant.likely at secretlab.ca;
marc.zyngier at arm.com; rob.herring at linaro.org;
bhupesh.sharma at freescal.com; Yoder Stuart-B08248;
arnab_basu at rocketmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] ARM64: Add support for FSL's LS2085A SoC

On Saturday 15 November 2014 16:16:25 Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
quoted
This patchset adds the support for FSL's LS2085A SoC which is based on
ARMv8 architecture.

This patchset also has patches which address DT compatible strings for
nodes which appear un-documented.

The enable-method for the CPU nodes is left for the bootloader (u-boot
or UEFI) to patch-up which is expected to be PSCI v0.2
Looks all good to me. Are you planning to send a pull request to
arm at kernel.org, or should we pick up the patches directly (provided no
more new review comments)?
It would be great if you can pick the patches directly (ofcourse, if there are
no new comments).
Ok, let's wait a few more days then, once everyone is happy please send
them "To: arm at kernel.org" with a request for us to merge them.

	Arnd
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help