Thread (41 messages) 41 messages, 5 authors, 2014-11-18
STALE4131d

[PATCH 04/21] thermal: of: Extend current of-thermal.c code to allow setting emulated temp

From: Lukasz Majewski <hidden>
Date: 2014-11-07 11:20:35
Also in: linux-pm, linux-samsung-soc

Hi Eduardo,
Hello,

On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 06:38:40PM +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
quoted
Before this change it was only possible to set get_temp() and
get_trend() methods to be used in the common code handling passing
parameters via device tree to "cpu-thermal" CPU thermal zone device.

Now it is possible to also set emulated value of temperature for
debug purposes.

Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <redacted>
---
 drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
 include/linux/thermal.h      |  6 ++++--
 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c
b/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c index cd74e64..f206375 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c
@@ -98,10 +98,22 @@ struct __thermal_zone {
 	void *sensor_data;
 	int (*get_temp)(void *, long *);
 	int (*get_trend)(void *, long *);
+	int (*set_emul_temp)(void *, unsigned long);
 };
 
 /***   DT thermal zone device callbacks   ***/
 
+static int of_thermal_set_emul_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
+				    unsigned long temp)
+{
+	struct __thermal_zone *data = tz->devdata;
+
+	if (!data->set_emul_temp)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	return data->set_emul_temp(data->sensor_data, temp);
+}
+
 static int of_thermal_get_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
 			       unsigned long *temp)
 {
@@ -352,7 +364,8 @@ static struct thermal_zone_device *
 thermal_zone_of_add_sensor(struct device_node *zone,
 			   struct device_node *sensor, void *data,
 			   int (*get_temp)(void *, long *),
-			   int (*get_trend)(void *, long *))
+			   int (*get_trend)(void *, long *),
+			   int (*set_emul_temp)(void *, unsigned
long))
Thanks for improving the API. However, looking at what is above, it
starts to be pretty ugly. And for sure, this is not the last callback
to be added.
Presumably there would be some more callbacks.
I believe it is time to add a .ops in the of-thermal.
While in here, do you mind adding the .ops in a separated patch, then
add the .set_emul_temp in the .ops field?
I will add an option to pass .ops with thermal_zone_of_add_sensor().

I'm only concerned a bit about testing other users of of-thermal. 
I have only beaglebone black (BBB) for testing, which on-soc bandgap
thermal sensor is very inaccurate and hence not supported even at BBB
github linux kernel repository (v3.14).

Because of above I would need your support for testing.
quoted
 {
 	struct thermal_zone_device *tzd;
 	struct __thermal_zone *tz;
@@ -366,10 +379,12 @@ thermal_zone_of_add_sensor(struct device_node
*zone, mutex_lock(&tzd->lock);
 	tz->get_temp = get_temp;
 	tz->get_trend = get_trend;
+	tz->set_emul_temp = set_emul_temp;
 	tz->sensor_data = data;
 
 	tzd->ops->get_temp = of_thermal_get_temp;
 	tzd->ops->get_trend = of_thermal_get_trend;
+	tzd->ops->set_emul_temp = of_thermal_set_emul_temp;
 	mutex_unlock(&tzd->lock);
 
 	return tzd;
@@ -411,7 +426,8 @@ thermal_zone_of_add_sensor(struct device_node
*zone, struct thermal_zone_device *
 thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(struct device *dev, int sensor_id,
 				void *data, int (*get_temp)(void
*, long *),
-				int (*get_trend)(void *, long *))
+				int (*get_trend)(void *, long *),
+				int (*set_emul_temp)(void *,
unsigned long)) {
 	struct device_node *np, *child, *sensor_np;
 
@@ -453,7 +469,8 @@ thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(struct device
*dev, int sensor_id, return thermal_zone_of_add_sensor(child,
sensor_np, data,
 							  get_temp,
-
get_trend);
+
get_trend,
+
set_emul_temp); }
 	}
 	of_node_put(np);
@@ -494,9 +511,11 @@ void thermal_zone_of_sensor_unregister(struct
device *dev, mutex_lock(&tzd->lock);
 	tzd->ops->get_temp = NULL;
 	tzd->ops->get_trend = NULL;
+	tzd->ops->set_emul_temp = NULL;
 
 	tz->get_temp = NULL;
 	tz->get_trend = NULL;
+	tz->set_emul_temp = NULL;
 	tz->sensor_data = NULL;
 	mutex_unlock(&tzd->lock);
 }
diff --git a/include/linux/thermal.h b/include/linux/thermal.h
index 0305cde..36010e9 100644
--- a/include/linux/thermal.h
+++ b/include/linux/thermal.h
@@ -290,14 +290,16 @@ struct thermal_genl_event {
 struct thermal_zone_device *
 thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(struct device *dev, int id,
 				void *data, int (*get_temp)(void
*, long *),
-				int (*get_trend)(void *, long *));
+				int (*get_trend)(void *, long *),
+				int (*set_emul_temp)(void *,
unsigned long)); void thermal_zone_of_sensor_unregister(struct
device *dev, struct thermal_zone_device *tz);
 #else
 static inline struct thermal_zone_device *
 thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(struct device *dev, int id,
 				void *data, int (*get_temp)(void
*, long *),
-				int (*get_trend)(void *, long *))
+				int (*get_trend)(void *, long *),
+				int (*set_emul_temp)(void *,
unsigned long)) {
 	return NULL;
 }
-- 
2.0.0.rc2


-- 
Best regards,

Lukasz Majewski

Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help