[RFC PATCH 2/2] arm: pcibios: move to generic PCI domains
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <hidden>
Date: 2014-11-03 11:23:09
Also in:
linux-pci
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 01:18:12AM +0000, Jingoo Han wrote:
On Thursday, October 30, 2014 8:45 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:quoted
Most if not all ARM PCI host controller device drivers either ignore the domain field in the pci_sys_data structure or just increment it every time a host controller is probed, using it as a domain counter. Therefore, instead of relying on pci_sys_data to stash the domain number in a standard location, ARM pcibios code can be moved to the newly introduced generic PCI domains code, implemented in commits: commit 41e5c0f81d3e676d671d96a0a1fafb27abfbd9 ("of/pci: Add pci_get_new_domain_nr() and of_get_pci_domain_nr()") commit 670ba0c8883b576d0aec28bd7a838358a4be1 ("PCI: Add generic domain handling") In order to assign a domain number dynamically, the ARM pcibios defines the function, called by core PCI code: void pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(...) that relies on a DT property to define the domain number or falls back to a counter; its usage replaces the current domain assignment code in PCI host controllers present in the kernel. Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Phil Edworthy <redacted> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <redacted> Cc: Jingoo Han <redacted> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Cc: Russell King <redacted> Cc: Mohit Kumar <redacted> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <redacted>(+CC Richard Zhu, Lucas Stach, Kishon Vijay Abraham I, Murali Karicheri) Acked-by: Jingoo Han <redacted>
Thank you Jingoo.
For a long time, I have wanted the patch like this. Personally,
I want to increase the build coverage and keep the same binary
regardless of config options as possible; thus, I don't like
#ifdef guards such as '#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS'. When I submitted
the first patch for 'pcie-designware.c', I was not able to find
a way to remove '#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS' from 'pcie-designware.c'.
This patch looks good and I think that this patch will not make
the problem. However, I didn't test this patch with Exynos platform,
due to some reasons. So, I hope that other engineers test this patch
on other SoC platforms related to designware PCIe.
To Mohit Kumar (ST SPEAR13XX), Richard Zhu/Lucas Stach (IMX6)
Kishon Vijay Abraham I (TI DRA7XX), Murali Karicheri (TI KEYSTONE)
Would you test this patch and share the result?
It would be very helpful. Thank you.I am happy to wait for a week or two before asking to add this code to -next, it would be definitely great to get more coverage on pcie-designware. Thanks, Lorenzo
Best regards, Jingoo Hanquoted
--- arch/arm/Kconfig | 3 +++ arch/arm/include/asm/mach/pci.h | 3 --- arch/arm/include/asm/pci.h | 7 ------- arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++--- drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c | 10 ++-------- drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c | 3 --- drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c | 3 --- 7 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig index 89c4b5c..29544f0 100644 --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig@@ -1292,6 +1292,9 @@ config PCI_DOMAINS bool depends on PCI +config PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC + def_bool PCI_DOMAINS + config PCI_NANOENGINE bool "BSE nanoEngine PCI support" depends on SA1100_NANOENGINEdiff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/pci.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/pci.h index 7fc4278..f19f627 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/pci.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/pci.h@@ -44,9 +44,6 @@ struct hw_pci { * Per-controller structure */ struct pci_sys_data { -#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS - int domain; -#endif struct list_head node; int busnr; /* primary bus number */ u64 mem_offset; /* bus->cpu memory mapping offset */diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/pci.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/pci.h index 7e95d85..585dc33 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/pci.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/pci.h@@ -18,13 +18,6 @@ static inline int pcibios_assign_all_busses(void) } #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS -static inline int pci_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus) -{ - struct pci_sys_data *root = bus->sysdata; - - return root->domain; -} - static inline int pci_proc_domain(struct pci_bus *bus) { return pci_domain_nr(bus);diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c b/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c index 17a26c1..d8c2b4e 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@ #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/init.h> #include <linux/io.h> +#include <linux/of.h> +#include <linux/of_pci.h> #include <asm/mach-types.h> #include <asm/mach/map.h>@@ -468,9 +470,6 @@ static void pcibios_init_hw(struct device *parent, struct hw_pci *hw, if (!sys) panic("PCI: unable to allocate sys data!"); -#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS - sys->domain = hw->domain; -#endif sys->busnr = busnr; sys->swizzle = hw->swizzle; sys->map_irq = hw->map_irq;@@ -511,6 +510,27 @@ static void pcibios_init_hw(struct device *parent, struct hw_pci *hw, } } +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC +static bool dt_domain_found; + +void pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus, struct device *parent) +{ + int domain = of_get_pci_domain_nr(parent->of_node); + + if (domain >= 0) { + dt_domain_found = true; + } else if (dt_domain_found == true) { + dev_err(parent, "Node %s is missing \"linux,pci-domain\" property in DT\n", + parent->of_node->full_name); + return; + } else { + domain = pci_get_new_domain_nr(); + } + + bus->domain_nr = domain; +} +#endif + void pci_common_init_dev(struct device *parent, struct hw_pci *hw) { struct pci_sys_data *sys;diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c index b1315e1..2b4c1f2 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c@@ -722,17 +722,11 @@ static int mvebu_pcie_setup(int nr, struct pci_sys_data *sys) { struct mvebu_pcie *pcie = sys_to_pcie(sys); int i; - int domain = 0; -#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS - domain = sys->domain; -#endif - - snprintf(pcie->mem_name, sizeof(pcie->mem_name), "PCI MEM %04x", - domain); + snprintf(pcie->mem_name, sizeof(pcie->mem_name), "PCI MEM %04x", nr); pcie->mem.name = pcie->mem_name; - snprintf(pcie->io_name, sizeof(pcie->io_name), "PCI I/O %04x", domain); + snprintf(pcie->io_name, sizeof(pcie->io_name), "PCI I/O %04x", nr); pcie->realio.name = pcie->io_name; if (request_resource(&iomem_resource, &pcie->mem))diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c index dfed00a..6790b87 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c@@ -502,9 +502,6 @@ int __init dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp) dw_pci.private_data = (void **)&pp; pci_common_init_dev(pp->dev, &dw_pci); -#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS - dw_pci.domain++; -#endif return 0; }diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c index 61158e0..b6b859e 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c@@ -404,9 +404,6 @@ static void rcar_pcie_enable(struct rcar_pcie *pcie) rcar_pci.private_data = (void **)&pcie; pci_common_init_dev(&pdev->dev, &rcar_pci); -#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS - rcar_pci.domain++; -#endif } static int phy_wait_for_ack(struct rcar_pcie *pcie) --2.1.2-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html