On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 07:51:42AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:

Am 02.11.2014 um 03:11 schrieb Jason Cooper:

quoted

On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 03:39:02PM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:

quoted

Will it be better to split this patch set?

For example:
part 1

quoted

  ARM: add mach-asm9260
  ARM: add lolevel debug support for asm9260

part2

quoted

  ARM: irqchip: mxs: prepare driver for HW with different offsets
  ARM: irqchip: mxs: add Alpascale ASM9260 support

and all other patches separately.

this will reduce review time for you and give some hope for me :D

I honestly prefer to keep the series together.  The subject lines make

To be clear, I meant the emails being in the same thread.

quoted

it clear which parts I need to worry about merging.  The big thing is
if there are compile-time dependencies between the different subsystems.
It doesn't look like there are, but if so, just bring it to our
attention.

Ok, i'll resend updated version against latest arm-soc/for-next.git, or
should i take other branch?

In general it's best to base against one of Linus' tags (eg v3.18-rc1)
and then rebase against something different only if asked.  That'll be
per subsystem, though.

Please don't forget to Cc the mach-mxs/ maintainers on the irqchip
changes.

thx,

Jason.