Pankaj Dubey wrote:

On Friday 21 November 2014 12:55 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:

quoted

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 01:34:29PM +0530, Pankaj Dubey wrote:

quoted

Let's handle i2c interrupt re-configuration in i2c driver. This will
help us in removing some soc specific checks from machine files and
will help in removing static iomapping of SYS register in exynos.c

Since only Exynos5250, and Exynos5420 has i2c nodes in DT, added syscon
based phandle to i2c device nodes of respective SoC DT files.

Well...actually there are 4ch i2c in exynos5410 and exynos5800 as well, i2c
nodes are not added in dt files though.

quoted

quoted

Also handle saving and restoring of SYS_I2C_CFG register during
suspend and resume of i2c driver.

CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
CC: Randy Dunlap <redacted>
CC: Wolfram Sang <redacted>
CC: Russell King <redacted>
CC: devicetree at vger.kernel.org
CC: linux-doc at vger.kernel.org
CC: linux-i2c at vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <redacted>
---
  .../devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-s3c2410.txt        |    1 +
  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi                  |    4 +++
  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi                  |    4 +++

I usually don't take DTS patches. They should go via arm-soc. Please say
so if there are reasons I should take them.

I CC'ed to you because same patch contains changes in i2c driver.
I am not very sure via which tree this should go. May be I can ask
samsung SoC maintainer Kukjin to look into this, as patch 2/2 has
changes in mach-exynos which should go via Kukjin's tree.

I'll reply on other email.

Thanks,
Kukjin