[PATCH V5] arm64: amd-seattle: Adding device tree for AMD Seattle platform
From: Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com (Suthikulpanit, Suravee)
Date: 2014-11-28 16:42:13
Also in:
lkml
On 11/28/14, 22:13, "Arnd Bergmann" [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wednesday 26 November 2014, suravee.suthikulpanit at amd.com wrote:quoted
From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> Initial revision of device tree for AMD Seattle Development platform. Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Marc Zyngier <redacted> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <redacted> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Lendacky <Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Joel Schopp <redacted> --- V5 Changes: * Rebase to arm-soc for-next (per Olof) * Restructure the DTS/DTSI into board and SoC configurations (per Olof) * Add model property at the top level (per Olof) * Move pcie0 under smb and change smb's ranges property to empty since pcie is not in the same range. (per Olof) * Change v2m0's ranges property (per Arnd) * Change timer interrupt type to level-trigger (per Marc)Applied to next/arm64, thanks!
Thank you
Looking at this one more time, I had another question:quoted
+ smb0: smb { + compatible = "simple-bus"; + #address-cells = <2>; + #size-cells = <2>; + ranges; + + /* DDR range is 40-bit addressing */ + dma-ranges = <0x80 0x0 0x80 0x0 0x7f 0xffffffff>; +What is a DDR range? Also, what is special about the last byte? Did you intentionally leave it out? I think when we calculate the dma mask, we will use 0x3fffffffff so we don't step on the last byte, which I assume is not what you intended. Arnd
Hm..probably not then. What I meant is to specify 40-bit addressing for the memory range starting from [0x80_0000_0000 - 0x100_0000_0000). As, I discussed with you on IRC, it should also cover the V2m MSI register frame, and should be starting from 0. The fix should then be: dma-ranges = <0 0 0 0 0x100 0x00000000> I will send a patch out to fix and add better comment for this. Thanks, Suravee