On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 10:08:28AM +0000, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:

On Fri, 2014-11-28 at 12:12 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:

quoted

(2014/11/27 23:36), Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:

[...]

quoted

quoted

I thought it good to see what sort of benefits this code achieves,
especially as it could grow quite complex over time, and the cost of
that versus the benefit should be considered.

I don't think it's so complex. It's actually cleanly separated.
However, ARM tree should have arch/arm/kernel/kprobe/ dir,
since there are too many kprobe related files under arch/arm/kernel/ ...

Yes, that does seem like a good idea. Or rather a 'probes' directory to
also include uprobes as that shares a lot of code with kprobes.

If you want to do this, then please make it arch/arm/probes rather than
making the directory tree deeper than it needs to be.

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.