On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 5:32 AM, Jassi Brar [off-list ref] wrote:

On 25 November 2014 at 05:47, Andrew Bresticker [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

This series adds support for xHCI on NVIDIA Tegra SoCs.  This includes:
 - patches 1, 2, and 3: minor cleanups for mailbox framework and xHCI,
 - patches 4 and 5: adding a driver for the mailbox used to communicate
   with the xHCI controller's firmware,
 - patches 6 and 7: extending the XUSB pad controller driver to support
   the USB PHY types (UTMI, HSIC, and USB3),
 - patches 8 and 9: adding a xHCI host-controller driver, and
 - patches 10, 11, and 12: updating the relevant DT files.

The mailbox driver (patch 5) has a compile-time dependency on patch 2 and
a run-time dependency on patch 3.  Both the PHY (patch 7) and host (patch 9)
drivers have compile-time dependencies on the mailbox driver.  The host
driver also has a run-time dependency on patch 1.  Because of this, this
entire series should probably go through the Tegra tree.

Why shouldn't I pick 2 & 3 at least?

I don't see why not.  Because of the PHY API change I'm going to have
to re-spin the series and at this point 3.19 is looking pretty
unlikely.  Maybe we could get a Tegra maintainer's ACK for patches 4
and 5 so that you could take them through your tree as well for 3.19?
(Stephen, Thierry, Alex?)