Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 2014-10-11
DORMANTno replies

Revision v9 of 14 in this series.

Revisions (14)
  1. v5 [diff vs current]
  2. v6 [diff vs current]
  3. v6 [diff vs current]
  4. v7 [diff vs current]
  5. v7 [diff vs current]
  6. v7 [diff vs current]
  7. v8 [diff vs current]
  8. v8 [diff vs current]
  9. v8 [diff vs current]
  10. v9 [diff vs current]
  11. v9 [diff vs current]
  12. v9 [diff vs current]
  13. v9 [diff vs current]
  14. v9 current

[PATCH v9 0/2] Adds PMU and S2R support for exynos5420

From: Vikas Sajjan <hidden>
Date: 2014-10-11 04:04:29
Also in: linux-samsung-soc

Hi Kevin,

On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 3:47 AM, Kevin Hilman [off-list ref] wrote:
Abhilash Kesavan [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 4:29 AM, Kevin Hilman [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Kevin Hilman [off-list ref] writes:

[...]
quoted
Trying $SUBJECT series on top of kukjin's for-next is working fine, but
I'm still not able to make it work on linux-next, with or without the
CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED patch.
Nevermind, turns out I didn't apply the CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED PATCH.  If I
actually apply it, I have it working on top of linux-next.  However, it
seems to have some issues with the nonboot CPUs resuming:

[   11.319833] Enabling non-boot CPUs ...
[   12.319134] CPU1: failed to come online
[   12.319235] Error taking CPU1 up: -5
[   13.319137] CPU2: failed to come online
[   13.319209] Error taking CPU2 up: -5
[   14.319133] CPU3: failed to come online
[   14.319224] Error taking CPU3 up: -5

Are you guys seeing all the non-boot CPUs coming up?  They fail to come
online, but the /sys/devices/.../cpu?/online reports that they are
online, which means the next attempt to hotplug them will probably BUG().

Also, If I turn off the switcher (enabled by default exynos_defconfig),
resume still has problems bringing all the nonboot CPUs online, and then
has a bunch of I2C errors[1].

And one more..., if I try enabling CPUidle[1] with exynos_defconfig, S2R
causes a reboot (seems to be on resume.)
I tested S2R on my Peach-Pi (Exynos5800) on linux-next-20141009. My tree has:

a57db95 TEMP: Use CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED for aclk200_disp1
18158ac ARM: EXYNOS: Use MCPM call-backs to support S2R on Exynos5420
I was missing this one.
quoted
d86cb2d ARM: exynos5: Add Suspend-to-RAM support for 5420
93f1b7c ARM: exynos5: Add PMU support for 5420
8dcc2db ARM: EXYNOS: Move PMU specific definitions from common.h
493a16a ARM: EXYNOS: Add platform driver support for Exynos PMU
64e73fb mfd: syscon: Decouple syscon interface from platform devices
af7b574 Add linux-next specific files for 20141009
4658bc0 Merge branch 'akpm/master'
9784a19 mm: add strictlimit knob

I have tested the following scenarios using exynos_defconfig with
CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_MAX77802 enabled:

1) CONFIG_BIG_LITTLE enabled (default in exynos_defconfig)
2) CONFIG_BIG_LITTLE disabled
3) CONFIG_ARM_BIG_LITTLE_CPUIDLE enabled

In all 3 cases the secondary cores as well as the system resume fine.
Can you please confirm if your kernel has a similar configuration ?
Adding in the missing dependency above, it's now working for me in all 3
scenarios. Looking back at the cover letter, I see it's clearly listed
as a dependency.  Sorry, my fault.

Feel free to add

Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <redacted>
Thanks a lot for testing.
to $SUBJECT series.

Kevin
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help