[PATCH v9 0/2] Adds PMU and S2R support for exynos5420 · Vikas Sajjan <hidden> · 2014-10-07
[PATCH v9 1/2] ARM: exynos5: Add PMU support for 5420 · Vikas Sajjan <hidden> · 2014-10-07
[PATCH v9 1/2] ARM: exynos5: Add PMU support for 5420 · javier@dowhile0.org (Javier Martinez Canillas) · 2014-10-07
[PATCH v9 1/2] ARM: exynos5: Add PMU support for 5420 · Vikas Sajjan <hidden> · 2014-10-08
[PATCH v9 2/2] ARM: exynos5: Add Suspend-to-RAM support for 5420 · Vikas Sajjan <hidden> · 2014-10-07
[PATCH v9 2/2] ARM: exynos5: Add Suspend-to-RAM support for 5420 · javier@dowhile0.org (Javier Martinez Canillas) · 2014-10-07
[PATCH v9 2/2] ARM: exynos5: Add Suspend-to-RAM support for 5420 · Vikas Sajjan <hidden> · 2014-10-08
[PATCH v9 0/2] Adds PMU and S2R support for exynos5420 · Vikas Sajjan <hidden> · 2014-10-08
[PATCH v9 0/2] Adds PMU and S2R support for exynos5420 · kgene@kernel.org (Kukjin Kim) · 2014-10-08
[PATCH v9 0/2] Adds PMU and S2R support for exynos5420 · Vikas Sajjan <hidden> · 2014-10-08
[PATCH v9 0/2] Adds PMU and S2R support for exynos5420 · javier@dowhile0.org (Javier Martinez Canillas) · 2014-10-08
[PATCH v9 0/2] Adds PMU and S2R support for exynos5420 · Vikas Sajjan <hidden> · 2014-10-08
[PATCH v9 0/2] Adds PMU and S2R support for exynos5420 · javier@dowhile0.org (Javier Martinez Canillas) · 2014-10-08

DORMANTno replies

Revision v9 of 12 in this series.

Revisions (12)

2014-09-25 v7 [diff vs current]
2014-09-29 v7 [diff vs current]
2014-09-30 v8 [diff vs current]
2014-09-30 v8 [diff vs current]
2014-09-30 v8 [diff vs current]
2014-10-01 v8 [diff vs current]
2014-10-02 v8 [diff vs current]
2014-10-08 v9 [diff vs current]
2014-10-08 v9 current
2014-10-09 v9 [diff vs current]
2014-10-09 v9 [diff vs current]
2014-10-10 v9 [diff vs current]

[PATCH v9 0/2] Adds PMU and S2R support for exynos5420

From: javier@dowhile0.org (Javier Martinez Canillas)
Date: 2014-10-08 11:55:55
Also in: linux-samsung-soc

Hello Vikas,

On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Vikas Sajjan [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Not related to your series but did you figure out why the
aclk200_disp1 and aclk300_disp1 clocks are left unused?

As mentioned earlier, I recently noticed that these clocks are
preventing system from suspending.
These clocks are used by the in-flight DRM display driver and once it
is merged the display driver will be handling the clock during boot-up
and suspend/resume.

Perfect, that was exactly what I was wondering. Thanks a lot for the
information!

Best regards,
Javier