Thread (14 messages) flat view 14 messages, 5 authors, 2014-10-28

[PATCH v2 6/7] arm64: dts: Add nodes for mmc, i2c, rtc, watchdog on Exynos7

From: Tomasz Figa <hidden>
Date: 2014-10-21 14:00:15
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-samsung-soc

On 21.10.2014 15:52, Alim Akhtar wrote:
quoted
+&mmc_0 {
+       status = "okay";
+       num-slots = <1>;
+       broken-cd;
+       caps2-mmc-hs200-1_8v;
Please use mmc_hs200-1_8v instead.
I guess you mean "mmc-hs200-1_8v" (with a hyphen between mmc and hs200).
quoted
+       supports-highspeed;
As per synopsys-dw-mshc DT binding documentation, supports-highspeed
property is deprecated, so please use common DT binding for this,
which is "cap-mmc-highspeed".
quoted
+       non-removable;
+       card-detect-delay = <200>;
+       clock-frequency = <800000000>;
+       samsung,dw-mshc-ciu-div = <3>;
+       samsung,dw-mshc-sdr-timing = <0 4>;
+       samsung,dw-mshc-ddr-timing = <0 2>;
+       pinctrl-names = "default";
+       pinctrl-0 = <&sd0_clk &sd0_cmd &sd0_qrdy &sd0_bus1 &sd0_bus4 &sd0_bus8>;
+       bus-width = <8>;
+};
+
+&mmc_2 {
+       status = "okay";
+       num-slots = <1>;
+       supports-highspeed;
Here also common DT binding please "cap-sd-highspeed"
Above you suggest "cap-mmc-highspeed" to replace the same deprecated
property, but here "cap-sd-highspeed". What is the rationale behind
using only one particular new property and not both for both controllers?

Best regards,
Tomasz
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help