On 10/20/2014 10:51 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
Dinh,
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 8:31 AM, [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_arria5_socdk.dts
@@ -37,6 +37,15 @@
*/
ethernet0 = &gmac1;
};
+
+ regulator_3_3v: regulator {
I think it's better to give this a real node name. The
"regulator_3_3v" will get dropped when you compile this into a binary
format (for shipping), so you're creating a node that's just called
"regulator". If you had more than one fixed regulator like this it
just won't work.
I haven't seen any official guidelines, but I tend to use "regulator"
as a suffix and then put the schematic name. Like:
3_3v_regulator: 3-3-v-regulator
Not sure if there's a limit on a node cannot start with numeric value?
But if I change it to your suggestion, the DTC does not compile:
Error: arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_socdk.dts:41.16-17 syntax error
FATAL ERROR: Unable to parse input tree
But regulator_3_3v: 3-3-v-regulator will work fine.
Dinh