Hi Santosh,

On 10/21/2014 09:05 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:

On 10/20/2014 05:56 AM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:

quoted

This patch switches Keystone 2 PM code to use Generic PM domains
instead of PM clock domains because of the lack of DT support
for the last.

Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
---
  .../bindings/power/ti,keystone-powerdomain.txt     |  31 ++++++
  arch/arm/mach-keystone/Kconfig                     |   1 +
  arch/arm/mach-keystone/pm_domain.c                 | 112 
++++++++++++++-------
  3 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
  create mode 100644 
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/ti,keystone-powerdomain.txt

diff --git 

a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/ti,keystone-powerdomain.txt 
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/ti,keystone-powerdomain.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4bbf2aa

--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/ti,keystone-powerdomain.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+* TI Keystone 2 Generic PM Controller
+
+The TI Keystone 2 Generic PM Controller is responsible for Clock gating
+for each controlled IP module.
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible: Should be "ti,keystone-powerdomain"
+- #power-domain-cells: Should be 0, see below:
+
+The gpc node is a power-controller as documented by the generic power 

domain

You renamed gpc but missed to fix the comment ? Pls update it.

ok.

quoted

+bindings in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt.
+
+Example:
+
+    pm_controller: pm-controller {
+        compatible = "ti,keystone-powerdomain";
+        #power-domain-cells = <0>;
+    };
+
+    netcp: netcp at 2090000 {
+        reg = <0x2620110 0x8>;
+        reg-names = "efuse";
+        ...
+        #address-cells = <1>;
+        #size-cells = <1>;
+        ranges;
+        power-domains = <&pm_controller>;
+
+        clocks = <&clkpa>, <&clkcpgmac>, <&chipclk12>;
+        dma-coherent;
+    }

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-keystone/Kconfig 

b/arch/arm/mach-keystone/Kconfig
index 98a156a..de43107 100644

--- a/arch/arm/mach-keystone/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-keystone/Kconfig

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ config ARCH_KEYSTONE
      select COMMON_CLK_KEYSTONE
      select ARCH_SUPPORTS_BIG_ENDIAN
      select ZONE_DMA if ARM_LPAE
+    select PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS if PM
      help
        Support for boards based on the Texas Instruments Keystone 

family of
        SoCs.

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-keystone/pm_domain.c 

b/arch/arm/mach-keystone/pm_domain.c
index ca79dda..d58759d 100644

--- a/arch/arm/mach-keystone/pm_domain.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-keystone/pm_domain.c

@@ -12,69 +12,107 @@
   * version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation.
   */

+#include <linux/clk.h>
  #include <linux/init.h>
-#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
  #include <linux/pm_clock.h>
+#include <linux/pm_domain.h>
  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
-#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
  #include <linux/of.h>

-#ifdef CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME
-static int keystone_pm_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS
+
+struct keystone_domain {
+    struct generic_pm_domain genpd;
+    struct device    *dev;
+};
+
+void keystone_pm_domain_attach_dev(struct device *dev)
  {
+    struct clk *clk;
      int ret;
+    int i = 0;

      dev_dbg(dev, "%s\n", __func__);

-    ret = pm_generic_runtime_suspend(dev);
-    if (ret)
-        return ret;
-
-    ret = pm_clk_suspend(dev);
+    ret = pm_clk_create(dev);
      if (ret) {
-        pm_generic_runtime_resume(dev);
-        return ret;
+        dev_err(dev, "pm_clk_create failed %d\n", ret);
+        return;
+    };
+
+    while ((clk = of_clk_get(dev->of_node, i++)) && !IS_ERR(clk)) {
+        ret = pm_clk_add_clk(dev, clk);
+        if (ret) {
+            dev_err(dev, "pm_clk_add_clk failed %d\n", ret);
+            goto clk_err;
+        };
      }

-    return 0;
+    if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME)) {

Can we not okkup two seperate callbacks instead of above check ?
I don't like this CONFIG check here. Its slightly better version of
ifdef in middle of the code.

I've found more-less similar comment on patch
"Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] power-domain: add power domain drivers for Rockchip platform"
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/17/257

So, Would you like me to create patch which will enable clocks in pm_clk_add/_clk()
in case !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME)

regards,
-grygorii