On Thu, 09 Oct 2014 16:00:20 +0200 Peter Oberparleiter [off-list ref] wrote:

Looks good. Andrew, can you pick this change up via your tree?

Sure.

On 09.10.2014 12:54, Riku Voipio wrote:

quoted

Following up the arm testing of gcov, turns out gcov on ARM64
works fine as well. Only change needed is adding ARM64 to Kconfig
depends.

Tested with qemu and mach-virt

Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio <redacted>
---
 kernel/gcov/Kconfig | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/gcov/Kconfig b/kernel/gcov/Kconfig
index cf66c5c..3b74087 100644
--- a/kernel/gcov/Kconfig
+++ b/kernel/gcov/Kconfig

@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ config GCOV_KERNEL
 config GCOV_PROFILE_ALL
 	bool "Profile entire Kernel"
 	depends on GCOV_KERNEL
-	depends on SUPERH || S390 || X86 || PPC || MICROBLAZE || ARM
+	depends on SUPERH || S390 || X86 || PPC || MICROBLAZE || ARM || ARM64
 	default n
 	---help---
 	This options activates profiling for the entire kernel.

gcov is doing this the wrong way.  There should be a `select
GCOV_PROFILE_ALL' in each arch/*/Kconfig.

(But pleeeeeeze not at the end of the list!  That's the perfect way of
maximizing patch conflicts, but nobody seems to understand this)