Hi Arnd,

-----Original Message-----
From: Arnd Bergmann [mailto:arnd at arndb.de]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 12:05 AM
To: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
Cc: Sharma Bhupesh-B45370; Catalin.Marinas at arm.com; mark.rutland at arm.com;
rob.herring at linaro.org; marc.zyngier at arm.com; Will.Deacon at arm.com; Yoder
Stuart-B08248; grant.likely at secretlab.ca; Basu Arnab-B45036
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 4/6] arm64: Add DTS support for FSL's LS2085A SoC

On Wednesday 03 September 2014 20:43:12 Bhupesh Sharma wrote:

quoted

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/fsl-ls2085a-simu.dts

b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/fsl-ls2085a-simu.dts
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3c0f953

--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/fsl-ls2085a-simu.dts

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+/*
+ * Device Tree file for Freescale LS2085a software Simulator model
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2014, Freescale Semiconductor
+ *
+ * Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@freescale.com>
+ *
+ * This file is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public
+ * License version 2.  This program is licensed "as is" without any
+ * warranty of any kind, whether express or implied.
+ */

One more thing, same comment as for the respective Exynos7 patch:
can this please be a permissive license, like GPLv2+MIT dual license?

Yes. I saw Russell's email in which he mentions that Linus is ok with using the MIT
X11 licenses ([1]). However, I am not sure I understand the GPLv2+MIT dual license.
Is it listed separately on [2], or is it a sum of the X11 + GPLv2 clauses mentioned in [2].

[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg358782.html
[2] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html

Regards,
Bhupesh