On 09/24/14 06:49, Lina Iyer wrote:

On Wed, Sep 24 2014 at 00:14 -0600, Pramod Gurav wrote:

quoted

Hi Lina,

On Wednesday 24 September 2014 05:21 AM, Lina Iyer wrote:

quoted

Add SPM device bindings for QCOM 8974 based cpus. SPM is the sub-system
power manager and controls the logic around the cores (cpu and L2).

Each core has an instance of SPM and controls only that core. Each cpu
SPM is configured to support WFI and SPC (standalone-power collapse).

Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <redacted>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974-pm.dtsi | 69
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi    | 10 +++--
 2 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974-pm.dtsi

<snip>

quoted

+};

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi

b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi
index 69dca2a..0580bc2 100644

--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
         #size-cells = <0>;
         interrupts = <1 9 0xf04>;

-        cpu at 0 {
+        CPU0: cpu at 0 {

Lina, Stephen boyd has sent some DT change for krait-cpufreq which also
renames this node to "cpu0: cpu at 0". If you both could sync up and agree
on a common naming('cpu0' with caps or not caps) for this node.

Sure. Will work with Stephen on that.

This doesn't seem like a big deal. I imagine Kumar can resolve the
conflict if the two patches merge at the same time.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation