Quoting Robert Jarzmik (2014-09-20 09:13:45)
Mike Turquette [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Quoting Arnd Bergmann (2014-08-24 05:08:19)
quoted
On Sunday 24 August 2014, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
quoted
quoted
By default, I'd expect Haojian to pick up the patches and send
us a pull request. He sent an Ack, but also didn't make it clear
that we should pick them up.
I was thinking that they would go through the clk maintainers, hence Haojian's
ack. If they should go through arm-soc, they would need Mike's ack.
Robert,
I'm happy to take the patches but they will need to be rebased onto
clk-next and refactored to take into account Tomeu's api split[0].
Hi Mike,
I have had a look at clk-next and Tomeu's split.
My current understanding is that Tomeu's patches don't apply on your clk-next,
as I get conflicts.
So either I rebase my patches on top of Tomeu's tree (as this is what will drive
most of the rebase work AFAIU), or I wait for Tomeu's tree to be merged into
your clk-next. Is there any chance Tomeu's work ends up in your clk-next tree
soon ?
Hi Robert,
Tomeu's stuff won't go into 3.18. I should have circled back to these
patches when that become apparent, but it got lost in the paperwork.
I can take these patches without you rebasing onto his work. Since we
have -rc7 I think there is time and these patches shouldn't wait for
another merge window. I've applied them to clk-next from a stable branch
with these six patches based on -rc1.
Hi Arnd,
I do not believe you'll need the stable branch (I tested merging it with
linux-next and there were no issues), but I've put one up anyways:
https://git.linaro.org/people/mike.turquette/linux.git clk-pxa27x
Regards,
Mike
Cheers.
--
Robert