Hi Chanho,

On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Chanho Park [off-list ref] wrote:

Hi,

quoted

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-arm-kernel [mailto:linux-arm-kernel-
bounces at lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of Abhilash Kesavan
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 1:47 PM
To: linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
kernel at lists.infradead.org; devicetree at vger.kernel.org;
catalin.marinas at arm.com
Cc: naveenkrishna.ch at gmail.com; kesavan.abhilash at gmail.com;
tomasz.figa at gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH v5 0/8] arch: arm64: Enable support for Samsung Exynos7
SoC

Changes since v4:
- Fixed comments from Tomasz Figa:
      - Changed the namespace prefix from exynos to samsung
      - Defined bindings to take all input clocks
      - Sorted the Kconfig entries alphabetically in clock Makefile
      - Used consistent 1 tab line breaks across the clock file
      - Statically initialized the samsung_cmu_info struct
- Enabled exynos7 in the arm64 defconfig as per Catalin Marinas' comment.
- Added Kukjin Kim's ack along with Thomas Abraham's tested and reviewed
tags.

Changes since v3:
- Removed aliases for serial controllers from dtsi file and moved it
  into board specific dts file as suggested by Arnd.
- Based this series on Robert Richter's patches for adding vendor
  device tree sub-directories for arm64.
  http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kbuild.devel/12131

This patchset supports the new Exynos7 Samsung SoC based on Cortex-A57.
Exynos7 is a System-On-Chip (SoC) that is based on 64-bit ARMv8 RISC
processor.

The following patches are tested based on linux-next tree (20140919).
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/

Following patches are required for this series:
1- "tty/serial: fix config dependencies for samsung serial"
   https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc <at>
vger.kernel.org/msg36208.html
2- "dts, kbuild: Implement support for dtb vendor subdirs" patchset
   http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kbuild.devel/12131

Thanks for your comments. I have mentioned Robert's patchset as being
a dependency for my series here.

Regards,
Abhilash

Maybe you make this patch on top of the Robert's patch.
As I know, Robert's patch is not yet merged in mainline.
You should specify this dependency in mail thread.

[1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/5/64

Best Regards,
Chanho Park