Mike Turquette [off-list ref] writes:

Quoting Arnd Bergmann (2014-08-24 05:08:19)

quoted

On Sunday 24 August 2014, Robert Jarzmik wrote:

quoted

quoted

By default, I'd expect Haojian to pick up the patches and send
us a pull request. He sent an Ack, but also didn't make it clear
that we should pick them up.

I was thinking that they would go through the clk maintainers, hence Haojian's
ack. If they should go through arm-soc, they would need Mike's ack.

Robert,

I'm happy to take the patches but they will need to be rebased onto
clk-next and refactored to take into account Tomeu's api split[0].

Hi Mike,

I have had a look at clk-next and Tomeu's split.
My current understanding is that Tomeu's patches don't apply on your clk-next,
as I get conflicts.

So either I rebase my patches on top of Tomeu's tree (as this is what will drive
most of the rebase work AFAIU), or I wait for Tomeu's tree to be merged into
your clk-next. Is there any chance Tomeu's work ends up in your clk-next tree
soon ?

Cheers.

-- 
Robert