On Monday, September 08, 2014 11:04:23 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

On Monday, September 08, 2014 09:26:20 AM Ulf Hansson wrote:

quoted

On 8 September 2014 00:13, Rafael J. Wysocki [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Thursday, September 04, 2014 03:52:29 PM Ulf Hansson wrote:

quoted

From: Tomasz Figa <redacted>

This patch introduces generic code to perform PM domain look-up using
device tree and automatically bind devices to their PM domains.

Generic device tree bindings are introduced to specify PM domains of
devices in their device tree nodes.

Backwards compatibility with legacy Samsung-specific PM domain bindings
is provided, but for now the new code is not compiled when
CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS is selected to avoid collision with legacy code.
This will change as soon as the Exynos PM domain code gets converted to
use the generic framework in further patch.

Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <redacted>
[Ulf:Added attach|detach functions, fixed review comments]
Tested-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>

However, for this one (and consequently the rest) I need an ACK from the
people who maintain the bindings.

These DT bindings have been discussed between Tomasz and devicetree
maintainers previously. So I think there are fine.

Also, when browsing the mail-archives, I found an ack from Rob Herrring:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-March/237989.html

I realize that I didn't put the DT maintainers on the to-line when
posting this patch, but just the devicetree list. I have now included
them on this reply, but maybe I should repost instead. What do you
think? Are you happy with the above ack from Rob?

That should be sufficient, but I wonder why you didn't add it to the patch
to start with?

BTW, I get bounces from t.figa at samsung.com, so I won't apply the patch with
that as the "From" field.  And the s-o-b from a bouncing address is worthless
too.

Rafael