[PATCH resend 1/4] clk: hix5hd2: add complex clk
From: Mike Turquette <hidden>
Date: 2014-09-03 17:37:53
Also in:
linux-devicetree
Quoting Zhangfei Gao (2014-08-25 22:46:07)
+static int clk_ether_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
+{
+ struct hix5hd2_clk_complex *clk = to_complex_clk(hw);
+ u32 val;
+
+ val = readl_relaxed(clk->ctrl_reg);
+ val |= clk->ctrl_clk_mask | clk->ctrl_rst_mask;
+ writel_relaxed(val, clk->ctrl_reg);
+ val &= ~(clk->ctrl_rst_mask);
+ writel_relaxed(val, clk->ctrl_reg);
+
+ val = readl_relaxed(clk->phy_reg);
+ val |= clk->phy_clk_mask;
+ val &= ~(clk->phy_rst_mask);
+ writel_relaxed(val, clk->phy_reg);
+ mdelay(10);
+
+ val &= ~(clk->phy_clk_mask);
+ val |= clk->phy_rst_mask;
+ writel_relaxed(val, clk->phy_reg);
+ mdelay(10);
+
+ val |= clk->phy_clk_mask;
+ val &= ~(clk->phy_rst_mask);
+ writel_relaxed(val, clk->phy_reg);
+ mdelay(30);
With all of these mdelays, I wonder if you should use .prepare and
.unprepare instead? Does the Ethernet driver call clk_{en|dis}able from
interrupt context?
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void clk_ether_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
+{
+ struct hix5hd2_clk_complex *clk = to_complex_clk(hw);
+ u32 val;
+
+ val = readl_relaxed(clk->ctrl_reg);
+ val &= ~(clk->ctrl_clk_mask);
+ writel_relaxed(val, clk->ctrl_reg);
+}
+
+static struct clk_ops clk_ether_ops = {
+ .enable = clk_ether_enable,
+ .disable = clk_ether_disable,
+};
+
+static int clk_complex_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
+{
+ struct hix5hd2_clk_complex *clk = to_complex_clk(hw);
+ u32 val;
+
+ val = readl_relaxed(clk->ctrl_reg);
+ val |= clk->ctrl_clk_mask;
+ val &= ~(clk->ctrl_rst_mask);
+ writel_relaxed(val, clk->ctrl_reg);
+
+ val = readl_relaxed(clk->phy_reg);
+ val |= clk->phy_clk_mask;
+ val &= ~(clk->phy_rst_mask);
+ writel_relaxed(val, clk->phy_reg);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void clk_complex_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
+{
+ struct hix5hd2_clk_complex *clk = to_complex_clk(hw);
+ u32 val;
+
+ val = readl_relaxed(clk->ctrl_reg);
+ val |= clk->ctrl_rst_mask;
+ val &= ~(clk->ctrl_clk_mask);
+ writel_relaxed(val, clk->ctrl_reg);
+
+ val = readl_relaxed(clk->phy_reg);
+ val |= clk->phy_rst_mask;
+ val &= ~(clk->phy_clk_mask);
+ writel_relaxed(val, clk->phy_reg);
+}
+
+static struct clk_ops clk_complex_ops = {
+ .enable = clk_complex_enable,
+ .disable = clk_complex_disable,
+};These enable/disable callbacks look good, with no delays. Regards, Mike