[PATCH v12 00/12] Support for creating generic PCI host bridges from DT
From: bhelgaas@google.com (Bjorn Helgaas)
Date: 2014-09-24 15:39:14
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-devicetree, linux-pci, lkml
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Liviu Dudau [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 02:30:37PM +0100, Rob Herring wrote:quoted
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Bjorn Helgaas [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Liviu Dudau [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
... While the next immediate target is converting pci-host-generic.c, pci-imx6.c and probably pcie-designware.c to my series, I would like to ask you what is your longer term plan. Now that I have got my head full of PCI code, I have some ideas but feel that meeting with you and all those involved in core PCI support would be a better venue than sending emails back and forth. When is your next plan to attend a Linux conference?That would be nice. Unfortunately, I don't know what the next conference will be yet.Perhaps an irc meeting or Google hangout. These have been happening on several areas like DT and ARM KVM.I'm open to the idea. I don't know if there is a recurring one already for PCI or how Bjorn has been handling future planning previously.
There is no periodic PCI meeting, and I don't have any formal future planning. We had PCI microconferences at the last couple Linux Plumbers conferences, but we didn't plan one for this year because it has been hard to get topic proposals (and I'm not going to be in D?sseldorf). I would attend an IRC or hangout meeting, of course. For myself, I think it would be most useful if it were to follow up on previously-posted patches, so I'd have a chance to look them over first, and then have the opportunity in a meeting to talk in more detail. If a meeting is a forum for abstract thinking about what we might do, it's hard for me to respond meaningfully in real time because I need time to research and explore things. Bjorn