Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 4 authors, 2014-09-24

[PATCH v2 2/3] watchdog: qcom: document device tree bindings

From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
Date: 2014-09-24 10:56:58
Also in: linux-arm-msm, linux-devicetree, linux-watchdog, lkml

On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 11:44:44AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 23 September 2014 18:04:37 Josh Cartwright wrote:
quoted
+- clocks : shall contain the input clock phandle
Just nitpicking, but this is not just a phandle, it's a clock
descriptor, which is a phandle followed by a set of arguments,
which may be empty, depending the on the clock controller
implementation.
We're _extremely_ inconsistent with terminology, so it's not confusing
people don't know what to put here.

Elsewhere people say "phandle + clock specifier" (which is correct),
"clock reference" (which is ok, but sounds like a phandle), etc. From
what I recall some documentation says some *-specifier properties
include the phandle too.

It would be really nice if we had one consistent way of refering to
phandle+args style properties.
I would just call it 'the input clock', rather than 'input clock
phandle'.
That's fine by me, given clocks is a well-understood standard property.

Mark.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help