[PATCH v3] mfd: syscon: Decouple syscon interface from platform devices
From: Li.Xiubo at freescale.com <hidden>
Date: 2014-09-18 07:58:22
Also in:
linux-samsung-soc, lkml
Hi, [...]
quoted
please see regmap_get_val_endian called in regmap_init function. static enum regmap_endian regmap_get_val_endian(struct device *dev, const struct regmap_bus *bus, const struct regmap_config*config) {quoted
struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; enum regmap_endian endian; ... } It will crash at the first line of dev->of_node if dev is NULL. Can you check if you're using the same code as mine?No, it's not same. My bad that I was not using linux-next for testing this patch. We tested on kgene/for-next where these changes still have not come. Just now I checked linux-next and found that it will crash at first line of "regmap_get_val_endian" as there is no check for NULL on dev. I checked git history of regmap.c file and found recently this file has been modified for adding DT endianness binding support. Following are set of patches gone for this cf673fb regmap: Split regmap_get_endian() in two functions 5844a8b regmap: Fix handling of volatile registers for format_write() chips 45e1a27 regmap: of_regmap_get_endian() cleanup ba1b53f regmap: Fix DT endianess parsing logic d647c19 regmap: add DT endianness binding support. I think there should have been a check for NULL on "dev" in "regmap_get_val_endian", so that if dev pointer exist then only it makes sense to get endianness property from DT. I will suggest following fix in regmap.c for this. With following fix I tested it and it works well on linux-next also. So if you can confirm following fix is working for you then I can post this patch. -------------------------------------------- Subject: [PATCH] regmap: fix NULL pointer dereference in regmap_get_val_endian Recent commits for getting reg endianess causing NULL pointer dereference if dev is passed NULL in regmap_init_mmio. This patch fixes this issue, and allows to parse reg endianess only if dev and dev->of_node exist.
Another question:
Then the regmap core cannot deal with the following issue:
Like the patch adding the endianness support for syscon:
[PATCH] mfd: syscon: binding: Add syscon endianness support.
So here just register one dummy syscon device is a good choice I do
think.
:)
Thanks,
BRs
Xiubo
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <redacted> --- drivers/base/regmap/regmap.c | 23 ++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/base/regmap/regmap.c b/drivers/base/regmap/regmap.c index f2281af..455a877 100644 --- a/drivers/base/regmap/regmap.c +++ b/drivers/base/regmap/regmap.c@@ -477,7 +477,7 @@ static enum regmap_endian regmap_get_val_endian(structdevice *dev, const struct regmap_bus *bus, const struct regmap_config *config) { - struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; + struct device_node *np; enum regmap_endian endian; /* Retrieve the endianness specification from the regmap config */@@ -487,15 +487,20 @@ static enum regmap_endian regmap_get_val_endian(structdevice *dev, if (endian != REGMAP_ENDIAN_DEFAULT) return endian; - /* Parse the device's DT node for an endianness specification */ - if (of_property_read_bool(np, "big-endian")) - endian = REGMAP_ENDIAN_BIG; - else if (of_property_read_bool(np, "little-endian")) - endian = REGMAP_ENDIAN_LITTLE; + /* If the dev and dev->of_node exist try to get endianness from DT */ + if (dev && dev->of_node) { + np = dev->of_node; - /* If the endianness was specified in DT, use that */ - if (endian != REGMAP_ENDIAN_DEFAULT) - return endian; + /* Parse the device's DT node for an endianness specification */ + if (of_property_read_bool(np, "big-endian")) + endian = REGMAP_ENDIAN_BIG; + else if (of_property_read_bool(np, "little-endian")) + endian = REGMAP_ENDIAN_LITTLE; + + /* If the endianness was specified in DT, use that */ + if (endian != REGMAP_ENDIAN_DEFAULT) + return endian; + } /* Retrieve the endianness specification from the bus config */ if (bus && bus->val_format_endian_default) -- Thanks, Pankaj Dubeyquoted
Regards Dong Aishengquoted
Thanks, Pankaj Dubeyquoted
Regards Dong Aishengquoted
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel