Thread (79 messages) 79 messages, 8 authors, 2014-09-18

[PATCH v5 10/12] sched: get CPU's utilization statistic

From: vincent.guittot@linaro.org (Vincent Guittot)
Date: 2014-09-16 22:43:40
Also in: lkml

On 15 September 2014 12:45, Morten Rasmussen [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 03:04:44PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 03:07:52PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
quoted
quoted
Also I'm not entirely sure I like the usage, utilization names/metrics.
I would suggest to reverse them. Call the pure running number
'utilization' and this scaled with capacity 'usage' or so.
ok. i can invert 'usage' and 'utilization', which will give

s/get_cpu_utilization/get_cpu_usage/
s/sgs->group_utilization/sgs->group_usage/
The confusion will have new dimensions added when we introduce
scale-invariance too. Then the running number is already scaled by the
current P-state compute capacity. But I don't have any better
suggestions.
quoted
quoted
s/cfs.usage_load_avg/cfs.utilization_load_avg/
I don't like using "load" for unweighted metrics. I associate load with
something that may be weighted by priority like load_avg_contrib, and
utilization with pure cpu utilization as in how many cycles is spend on
a particular task. I called it "usage_util_avg" in my own patches, but
"util_avg" might be better if we agree that utilization == usage.
ok. so i don't have the same definition than you. IMHO, load should be
used for figures that have used the average of the geometric series
used in the per entity load tracking more than the fact that we weight
the figures with priority
quoted
quoted
s/se->avg.usage_avg_contrib/se->avg.utilization_avg_contrib
util_avg_contrib maybe to keep it shorter.
quoted
quoted
s/__update_task_entity_usage/__update_task_entity_utilization
s/__update_entity_usage_avg_contrib/__update_entity_utilization_avg_contrib
Maybe use "util" here as well?
I agree that utilization can be a bit too long but util sounds a bit
too short ans we loose the utilization meaning. so we could use
activity instead of utilization

Nevertheless, the most important is that we find a common definition convention

Would the following proposal be ok ?

s/get_cpu_utilization/get_cpu_usage/
s/sgs->group_utilization/sgs->group_usage/
s/cfs.usage_load_avg/cfs.activity_load_avg/
s/se->avg.usage_avg_contrib/se->avg.activity_avg_contrib
s/__update_task_entity_usage/__update_task_entity_activity
s/__update_entity_usage_avg_contrib/__update_entity_activity_avg_contrib

Vincent
Morten
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help