[PATCH v5 3/8] arm: fixmap: implement __set_fixmap()
From: Kees Cook <hidden>
Date: 2014-09-11 16:27:06
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Will Deacon [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 05:05:14PM +0100, Kees Cook wrote:quoted
Actually, this doesn't make sense. If we're using local_flush_tlb_kernel_range() in set_fixmap, we must always run under stop_machine. The needs-broadcast case is solved by using local_flush_tlb_kernel_range(), and the TLB-miss-on-other-CPU case is solved by using stop_machine(). This is how the ftrace case work, though not via fixmap. Since we need to flush the TLB on each fixmap change during patch_text(), if we want to make the local_flush_tlb_... optionally use flush_tlb_... to avoid calling stop_machine in the does't-need-broadcast case, then we'd be checking in multiple places, making this code overly complex for this rare operation. Is there a good reason to complicate this code to avoid stop_machine()? I think we should just do this:diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/patch.c b/arch/arm/kernel/patch.c index 07314af47733..5038960e3c55 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/patch.c +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/patch.c@@ -60,16 +125,5 @@ void __kprobes patch_text(void *addr, unsigned int insn) .insn = insn, }; - if (cache_ops_need_broadcast()) { - stop_machine(patch_text_stop_machine, &patch, cpu_online_mask); - } else { - bool straddles_word = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL) - && __opcode_is_thumb32(insn) - && ((uintptr_t)addr & 2); - - if (straddles_word) - stop_machine(patch_text_stop_machine, &patch, NULL); - else - __patch_text(addr, insn); - } + stop_machine(patch_text_stop_machine, &patch, NULL);The reason not to use stop machine is that it's very expensive and the architecture does provide some guarantees that mean it's not always required... ... however, as I pointed out in a kprobes thread the other day, the code you remove above is actually broken, so I wouldn't be against replacing it all with stop_machine.
Okay, sounds good.
Is there any way to you can WARN_ON(!called_under_stop_machine) in set_fixmap before doing the local TLBI?
I'm not sure what the right tests for that would be. As I understand it, this can be called during early boot too, but I'm not sure how to distinguish either being early or being under stop machine. Rabin or Rob, I think you've worked on this from the perspective of early boot, any ideas? In the meantime, I could add a comment on set_fixmap...
Will P.S. If you plan on doing an equivalent series for arm64, you should do it before we have any broken CPUs, then you can use TLBI without worry ;)
Heh. Hopefully I can start testing arm64 soon. I think Laura sent a series for CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA already, so I'm hoping by the time I get 64-bit hardware, this will already be done. ;) -Kees -- Kees Cook Chrome OS Security