Thread (99 messages) 99 messages, 15 authors, 2015-03-16

[PATCH] ARM: /proc/cpuinfo: Use DT machine name when possible

From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
Date: 2014-09-05 13:59:11
Also in: lkml

On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 02:52:05PM +0100, Pali Roh?r wrote:
On Friday 05 September 2014 15:45:42 Mark Rutland wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 12:38:40PM +0100, Pali Roh?r wrote:
quoted
On Wednesday 18 June 2014 18:54:24 Pali Roh?r wrote:
quoted
Machine name from board description is some generic name
on DT kernel. DT provides machine name property which is
specific for board, so use it instead generic one when
possible.

Signed-off-by: Pali Roh?r <redacted>
---

 arch/arm/kernel/setup.c |    7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c index 8a16ee5..fbc7b4f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
@@ -875,10 +875,13 @@ void __init setup_arch(char
**cmdline_p)

 	setup_processor();
 	mdesc = setup_machine_fdt(__atags_pointer);

-	if (!mdesc)
+	if (mdesc)
+		machine_name = of_flat_dt_get_machine_name();
+	else

 		mdesc = setup_machine_tags(__atags_pointer,

__machine_arch_type); machine_desc = mdesc;
-	machine_name = mdesc->name;
+	if (!machine_name)
+		machine_name = mdesc->name;

 	if (mdesc->reboot_mode != REBOOT_HARD)
 	
 		reboot_mode = mdesc->reboot_mode;
So, do you really want to break userspace which reading file
/proc/cpuinfo (after migration from boardcode --> DT)?
You have no guarantee model name in the DT == the name in a
board file anyhow, and trying to force that is wrong. So
further to Russell's reply, I must NAK this from a DT
perspective.

Realistically your userspace is already broken if relying on
such things. You built something that only ever worked for a
particular arbitrary string. So it was already broken for
every other board, and there was never any guarantee that new
boards where your userspace could have worked would share the
same name.

You're trying to fix the wrong side of the equation.

Mark.
So what is your suggestion for identifing board (name/type) which 
will work with any kernel (and will not be broken again by kernel 
later)?
Without knowing your use case I have no idea if that's even a sane thing
to do.

Mark.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help