Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 4 authors, 2014-09-05

[PATCH] pinctrl: st: Add remove function and remove gpio_chip on failure

From: Pramod Gurav <hidden>
Date: 2014-09-05 04:49:14
Also in: lkml

Hi Srini,

Thanks for review.

On 04-09-2014 11:38 PM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
Pramod,
sorry for delay in reply as I was travelling, still in Jet lag.
quoted
Signed-off-by: Pramod Gurav <redacted>
---
  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c |   25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c
index 5475374..9296845 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-st.c
@@ -1517,6 +1517,7 @@ static int st_gpiolib_register_bank(struct st_pinctrl *info,
  					   0, handle_simple_irq,
  					   IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW);
  		if (err) {
+			gpiochip_remove(&bank->gpio_chip);
This change-set looks good.
IMO, you can send a patch for this change set.
Will resend just this.
quoted
  			dev_info(dev, "could not add irqchip\n");
  			return err;
  		}
@@ -1685,6 +1686,29 @@ static int st_pctl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  	return 0;
  }
quoted
+static int st_pctl_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
Ideally this driver will not be removed, as other drivers depend on 
this, even the serial.

so I see no big achievement in adding the remove functionality, as this 
is going to be a dead code and would never be tested.
quoted
+	struct st_pinctrl *info = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
+	struct device_node *child;
+	struct gpio_chip gpio_chip;
+	int bank = 0;
+
quoted
+	if (info->nbanks) {
+		for_each_child_of_node(np, child) {
+			if (of_property_read_bool(child, "gpio-controller")) {
We should not re-parse the DT nodes once we are done with it in the probe.
Thanks. :)
quoted
+				gpio_chip = info->banks[bank].gpio_chip;
+				gpiochip_remove(&gpio_chip);
+				bank++;
+			}
+		}
+	}
+
I think the logic is very simple:

	while (nbanks--)
		gpiochip_remove(&info->banks[bank++].gpio_chip))
Thanks again. Remove is not needed hence will not do this. But good know.

thanks,
srini
quoted
+	pinctrl_unregister(info->pctl);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
  static struct platform_driver st_pctl_driver = {
  	.driver = {
  		.name = "st-pinctrl",
@@ -1692,6 +1716,7 @@ static struct platform_driver st_pctl_driver = {
  		.of_match_table = st_pctl_of_match,
  	},
  	.probe = st_pctl_probe,
+	.remove = st_pctl_remove,
  };

  static int __init st_pctl_init(void)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help