On Mon, 01 Sep 2014, Nishanth Menon wrote:

On 09/01/2014 04:32 AM, Lee Jones wrote:

quoted

On Fri, 29 Aug 2014, Nishanth Menon wrote:

quoted

On 08/29/2014 05:56 AM, Lee Jones wrote:

quoted

On Tue, 19 Aug 2014, Nishanth Menon wrote:

quoted

With the recent pinctrl-single changes, omaps can treat wake-up events
from deeper idle states as interrupts.

Let's add support for the optional second interrupt for wake-up
events. And then SoC can wakeup and handle the event using it's
regular handler.

Finally, to pass the wake-up interrupt in the dts file,
interrupts-extended property needs to be passed.

This is similar in approach to commit 2a0b965cfb6e ("serial: omap: Add
support for optional wake-up")

Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/palmas.txt |   20 ++++++++

DT Ack please.

Please read Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submittingpatches.txt

I assume you wanted me to note the following:
"
The Documentation/ portion of the patch should be a separate patch.
"

Many maintainers prefer that when the bindings for the device is
new, and when additional properties are added, they prefer it part
of same patch.. Anyways.. if the above is what you prefer, I can
follow that.

I tend to like it done properly please.

In short, I assume you'd like three patches:
a) fix up style of current documentation - palmas to palmas at 40
b) Split documentation for interrupt-extended from the current patch
into it's own patch.
c) remainder of this patch as is..

Does that sound right?

That does, thanks.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog