On 8/18/2014 2:26 PM, joro at 8bytes.org wrote:

On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 01:48:46PM -0700, Olav Haugan wrote:

quoted

On 8/18/2014 11:32 AM, Rob Clark wrote:

quoted

No, I do not have other uses right now. But could imagine use cases like
"force <insert minimum mapping size here> mapping" flag etc.

I think it is worth discussing to add a flush() function to the
IOMMU-API. I sent a patch-set myself a few years ago introducing an
iommu_commit() function with the same semantics, but this is
out-of-scope for this patch-set.

Also adding a flag parameter to iommu_map_sg would introduce an
asymentrie in the API to the iommu_map() function. So please leave it
out for this patch-set, when we really need a flag parameter someday we
can introduce it for iommu_map() and iommu_map_sg() together.

Sure, I can remove it. I was trying to make iommu_map_sg/iommu_unmap_sg
symmetric :-)

Anything else before I push v6?


Thanks,

Olav

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation