Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2014-08-18

[PATCH v5 1/1] iommu-api: Add map_sg/unmap_sg functions

From: Olav Haugan <hidden>
Date: 2014-08-18 20:48:46
Also in: linux-arm-msm, linux-iommu

On 8/18/2014 11:32 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:07 AM, joro at 8bytes.org [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 09:56:11AM -0700, Olav Haugan wrote:
quoted
On 8/12/2014 3:48 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
quoted
iirc, one plan for 'flags' was some sort of DONT_FLUSH_TLB flag for
drivers which wanted to map/unmap N buffers with a single flush at the
end.  There might have been some other usages envisioned.
Yes, that was the original intent of the flags for now. I am sure we can
find other uses for this in the future.
Do you have anything else in mind already besides the DONT_FLUSH_TLB
flag?
No, I do not have other uses right now. But could imagine use cases like
"force <insert minimum mapping size here> mapping" flag etc.
quoted
How is the IOTLB supposed to be flushed when this flag is used?
well, I was thinking one of two ways:

1) add new flush() vfunc.. this, I think, would be most convenient for
drivers using this feature
2) or driver simply doesn't set DONT_FLUSH_TLB flag on the last
{map,unmap}..  that would be slightly more awkward to use, but would
avoid adding a new vfunc
I agree and would support adding a public flush() API. It is cleaner.
However, it does allow clients to chose which method to use. Either an
extra call to flush() or just do not pass DONT_FLUSH_TLB flag on the
last invocation of map/unmap.


Thanks,

Olav

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help