On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 06:10:28PM +0800, zhangfei wrote:

On 08/27/2014 05:51 PM, Sean Young wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 04:49:59PM +0800, zhangfei wrote:

quoted

On 08/21/2014 06:07 PM, Sean Young wrote:

IR. There is be no reason to run lircd if you use this method.

Do you mean kernel decoder is enough to cover?
We use user space lircd to cosider more flexibility, even some
non-standard protocol.

Just out of interest, what flexibility does lircd offer which the kernel
decoders do not? 

Anyway both method can be supported, depending on whether setting
the optional property "linux,rc-map-name" or not.

Great, thanks.

Sean