[PATCH] devicetree: bindings: Document Gateworks vendor prefix

On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Tim Harvey [off-list ref] wrote:

On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Florian Fainelli [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Le 10/08/2014 01:15, Tim Harvey a ?crit :

quoted

Add Gateworks Corporation to the list of device tree vendor prefixes.

Gateworks designs and manufactures single board computers designed for
embedded wireless and wired network applications.

Signed-off-by: Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com>
---
  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 1 +
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt

b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
index 46a311e..803fa4f 100644

--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt

@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ globalscale   Globalscale Technologies, Inc.
  gmt   Global Mixed-mode Technology, Inc.
  google        Google, Inc.
  gumstix       Gumstix, Inc.
+gw     Gateworks Corporation

I would go with "gateworks" here, "gw" is usually a shorter term for
"gateway", and there is an actual company called "Gateway" also
manufacturing various types of computers.
--
Florian

Hi Florian,

Well... I got to the table first with Gateworks so I don't see why I
can't take the 'gw' prefix personally. Note that I do have several
devicetree files in arch/arm/dts/imx6-gw*.dts* already in mainline
that use the 'gw' vendor prefix (albeit one could argue that I should
have been asked to add 'gw' to the vendor-prefixes.txt back then, but
that is not the way things went down).

We prefer stock ticker symbols, but GW doesn't appear to be one. So
given this is already in use and your are first, gw is fine. I've
queued this patch up.

Rob