Am Freitag, 1. August 2014, 13:26:43 schrieb Jaehoon Chung:

Hi, All.

It seems too late that this patch-set is merged into linux-3.16.
Also there are some conflicts in device-tree. (I will remove the conflicts)
So if everybody is ok, I will rebase on linux-next after released
linux-3.16. At that time, i will send this patch-set to stable kernel, too.
how about?

And I want to know who can apply this patch-set(#3~#5).

I guess each SoC maintainer could take the changes to their work-area, once 
the core changes have landed in the mmc tree. So I would take the Rockchip 
patch, Kukjin the Exynos one and Dinh the socfpga patch.


Heiko

Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung

On 08/01/2014 03:36 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:

quoted

On 08/01/14 01:02, Doug Anderson wrote:

quoted

Jaehoon

On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:35 PM, Jaehoon Chung[off-list ref]  

wrote:

quoted

quoted

quoted

Slot quirks "disable-wp" is deprecated.
Instead, use the host quirk "disable-wp".
(Because the slot-node is removed in dt-file.)

Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung<jh80.chung@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Sachin Kamat<redacted>
Acked-by: Seungwon Jeon<redacted>
---

  drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c  |   11 +++++++++--
  include/linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h |    2 ++
  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Thanks for taking my suggestion and making it backward compatible.
This looks great to me.  It tested this in both the backward
compatible way (with the warning) and the non-backward compatible way.
I think we should land and patch #2 ASAP and then we can land the rest
of the series as SoC maintainers see fit.

Yes, right if we don't want to see useless merge conflicts...

When I sent ack on exynos stuff, there was no conflict with my tree but
happens it now.

- Kukjin

quoted

Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson<dianders@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Doug Anderson<dianders@chromium.org>